Understanding MediShield Life & What should you do (Part 3: Integrated Shield Plans - Uncovered Problems and Proposed Solutions)


Article Author - Eddy Cheong
By Eddy Cheong
Jul 18, 2014

While MediShield Life will be offering better benefits than its predecessor, MediShield, it is nonetheless meant for hospitalisation in B2/C wards. People who want higher class wards in B1/A or even at private hospitals would have to purchase Integrated Shield Plans (IPs) from private insurers, namely, AIA, Aviva Great Eastern, NTUC Income and Prudential.

An Integrated Shield Plan is essentially made up of 2 parts - a basic MediShield, which is managed by the CPF Board and a top-up portion with enhanced benefits managed by the private insurer.

Operationally, the private insurer acts as the point-of-contact to deal with all communication with the integrated shield plan policyholders from the collection of premium to the settlement of claim. When the premium is collected from the policyholder, the private insurer will then split and pass the portion of premium attributed to MediShield Life to CPF Board. In the event of getting a claim, the private insurer settles the claim with the policyholder and gets reimbursed from CPF Board for the MediShield Life portion of the claim.


Part 3: Integrated Shield Plans - Uncovered Problems and Proposed Solutions


Consumers' Dissatisfaction with IPs

As many as 60% of Singaporeans have an Integrated Shield Plan since it was introduced in 2008. While IPs are popular, there seems to be an undercurrent of dissatisfaction or confusion that was not brought to awareness until now, says the MediShield Life Review Committee.


Some insights from focused group discussions are:


  1. People Overstretching Themselves To Buy IPs

    The majority of Singaporeans want higher coverage than the basic wards in B2/C. This behaviour is understandable as there are plenty of anecdotal stories that subsidised wards are perpetually over-crowded, long waiting time and lower quality of care. However, many seem to have overstretched themselves in getting higher coverage, especially when they are still young and working since the premiums are quite affordable and can be paid by Medisave. Some have the intention to downgrade later when premiums become more expensive at an older age.

  2. Not Fully Utilising Their Entitlement

    The table below shows the types of IPs people have and the choice of ward they actually stay in during hospitalisation:

    People with IP that entitles them to stay in:

    Percentage of people who choose to stay at

    below their
    entitlement
    (over-insured)

    What they are
    entitled to
    (correctly insured)

    Above their
    entitlement
    (under-insured)

    Public hospitals, A ward

    70%

    20%

    10%

    Private hospitals

    60%

    40%

    -


    More than half of policyholders who have higher coverage in A ward and private hospitals are actually not making full use of IPs. They are over insuring themselves resulting in wastage of personal resources.

  3. Poor understanding of IPs

    People have limited knowledge about the IPs they have signed up for. They may know the wards they are entitled to, but pay little attention to aspects such as computation of claims, how much premiums they have to pay and whether their pre-existing medical conditions are excluded. Hence, dissatisfaction usually arises when they need to file a claim or when they have to pay more during renewal.

  4. Affordability

    There were 2 major premium hikes for IPs in 2008 and 2013 with some experiencing a sharp rise by more than 100%. IPs providers would justify the reason of the hike to be medical inflation, revision to MediShield and further enhancements added to their IPs. However, the magnitude of the increase over a short period of time has caused people to wonder about the sustainability and affordability of IPs.

  5. Exclusion of Pre-existing Conditions

    Some policyholders are not aware that their pre-existing conditions were excluded in their IPs until they filed for claims. They were unhappy that such exclusion was not clearly communicated to them. Others felt that the underwriting for IP is too strict to exclude minor pre-existing conditions. They wanted insurers to be more flexible and discerning in underwriting.

  6. Insurer practices create uncertainty among policyholders

    Insurers’ practice of revising policy benefits and premiums, leaving policyholders with little choice over whether to accept, downgrade or switch insurer (if they are still healthy) causes a lot of frustration. They hope the government can step in to regulate how these changes are made.



MediShield Life Review Recommendations to make IPs work better

One significant outcome of the MediShield Life Review is the much needed call to review and improve the way IP is being managed. The main suggestions and recommendations by the Review Committee are:


  1. Government to work with insurers to develop the key features for a Standard IP meant for B1 ward

    Standardisation of plans will make comparison across insurers easier to understand. Since benefits are similar, the premiums across IP insurers should not vary too much.

  2. Premiums for the Standard IP should form the basis for setting MediSave Withdrawal Limits for IPs.

    This will benefit the older policyholders as more of their Medisave can be used to pay the higher premiums.

  3. Allowing IP insurers to manage pre-existing conditions differently

    Instead of applying exclusion to pre-existing conditions, insurers can consider other ways such as risk-loading (i.e. premium loading) for policyholders who wish to pay more to have any pre-existing conditions covered.

  4. Reviewing regulation of IP and industry practices

    This includes improving the way IPs are sold and clearer communication between the insurers and the policyholders.

  5. Suggestion to insurers to look into cost management measures to manage medical inflation

    The main reasons for increase in premiums are: the generous “as-charged” feature and the high professional fees in the private healthcare sectors. Insurers should consider establishing benchmarks for professional fees to support cost management efforts and explore shared data to allow better scrutiny of unusually large bills.



Conclusion

The Integrated Shield Plan is an important hospital insurance catering to those who want coverage higher than B2/C wards. However, the way IPs are currently operating has caused much concern and frustration. Now that the government has stepped in to initiate improvements, the future of IPs will hopefully become more relevant, more sustainable and more affordable.


To read more content like this, subscribe to our mailing list.

DIYInsurance (Do It Your-way Insurance) is Singapore's First Life Insurance Comparison Web Portal started in June 2014 by Providend Ltd to empower people to make informed decisions about their own insurance purchases. In addition to ongoing promotions, we rebate 50% of the agent’s commissions back to our clients so that they enjoy greater cost savings.


The Trusted Place to be Insured

MAS-licensed since 2003 | Expert advisers to assist you | Advisers not commission-based | Dedicated after-sales service | Secure and easy process


Like this article? Don't forget to share.


Term or Whole Life?

A Comprehensive Consumer Guide to Life Insurance

The Case of Term vs Whole Life Insurance eBook
Learn about:
  • What types of insurance do you really need?
  • How should you plan for your insurance?
  • How long do you need coverage for?
  • How much insurance do you need?
Please provide Name
Please provide Email Please provide Valid Email
Need Help?

Chat with us. We will answer your insurance questions!

Live Chat

Call Us
Call Icon

(65) 6309 2478

Add New Comment

Go ahead and ask our non-commissions based planners!

Speak to us online

Live Chat

Call us on our hotline

6309 2478

Let us contact you

Send a message

Top